In the final “Look Back” column looking at 30 years of Mainebiz, we recall some of the annual “outlook” issues, what they got right and what they might have missed.
Get Instant Access to This Article
Subscribe to Mainebiz and get immediate access to all of our subscriber-only content and much more.
- Critical Maine business news updated daily.
- Immediate access to all subscriber-only content on our website.
- Bi-weekly print or digital editions of our award-winning publication.
- Special bonus issues like the Mainebiz Book of Lists.
- Exclusive ticket prize draws for our in-person events.
Click here to purchase a paywall bypass link for this article.
For at least the past two editors at Mainebiz — a decade under my watch and five years under Carol Coultas — the first issue of the year has been devoted to an economic outlook.
Under Carol’s watch, the “economic” aspect was quite literal, with a lineup of economists making predictions. In recent years, we’ve opened it up to leaders of all kinds — from small businesses, publicly traded companies, nonprofits, professional services firms and health care institutions.
There were highlights and lowlights, on-target predictions and wildly off-target misses. Here are some samples:
In 2015, when Maine was still feeling the effects of the 2008–09 recession, Charlie Colgan, former professor of public policy and management at the University of Southern Maine, foreshadowed later challenges with labor shortages: “Maine has about 10,000 jobs to recover before we get back to pre-recession levels, and we should make it most of the way back by the end of 2015 or 2016. But Maine is also at the leading edge of labor shortages that will characterize the economy for the next several decades, and our ability to add jobs is becoming constrained.”
A year later, in 2016, Jonathan Reisman, an associate professor at University of Maine Machias, took an even more pessimistic view of Maine’s ability to tackle labor shortages: “Not with our current business and political climate. The answer, short of a time machine to go back and raise fertility rates, is immigration, but you need a ‘pull’ factor to compete with other states or countries, and improve our attitudes toward capitalism and immigrants.”
In 2019, the last full year before the pandemic, forecaster Jim Damicis of Camoin Associates said he was encouraged by the growth of multifamily housing. “Changing market dynamics call for multifamily and workforce housing, and housing to meet the needs of an aging population.” All that was true, but we had no idea what was ahead with the housing demand as the pandemic saw a wave of urban refugees seeking Maine’s more rural living.
In January 2020, just two months before COVID-19 lockdowns, the business forecast was eerily rosy. One financial advisor cited a “continued positive outlook,” while a banker was buoyed by the economy’s “very robust pace.”
Yet in early 2020 there were also concerns about worker shortages, rising construction and health care costs, not to mention the upcoming elections, which were expected to be “hotly contested.” All of this foreshadowed a historically challenging year.
