The leader of the Maine State Chamber of Commerce and others blasted a bill that would sharply curtail the ability of Maine businesses to use third-party data and location-based advertising to reach customers without additional consent.
Already a Subscriber? Log in
Get Instant Access to This Article
Subscribe to Mainebiz and get immediate access to all of our subscriber-only content and much more.
- Critical Maine business news updated daily.
- Immediate access to all subscriber-only content on our website.
- Bi-weekly print or digital editions of our award-winning publication.
- Special bonus issues like the Mainebiz Book of Lists.
- Exclusive ticket prize draws for our in-person events.
Click here to purchase a paywall bypass link for this article.
Dozens of business leaders from across Maine voiced their opposition to a data privacy bill they argue would deal a blow to the state's economy by prohibiting standard digital marketing practices.
“We are on the precipice of placing Maine in a regulatory island,” Patrick Woodcock, president and CEO of the Maine State Chamber of Commerce, said at a press conference Tuesday morning at the Cross Insurance Arena in Portland.
Standing shoulder to shoulder with executives from restaurants to tourism, Woodcock blasted a bill that would sharply curtail the ability of Maine businesses to use third-party data and location-based advertising to reach customers without additional consent.
“It has been called a straitjacket on Maine businesses,” Woodcock told the crowd over the sounds of hockey sticks in the ice arena below during a Maine Mariners practice. “This is not the time to impose a straitjacket.”
With data privacy already tested in dozens of states, Woodcock recommends that Maine follow proven best practices that balance consumer protections with tools businesses need to reach customers.
“Let’s give consumers privacy while also protecting businesses," he said.
LD 1822, introduced by state Rep. Amy Kuhn, D-Falmouth, passed both the Maine House and Senate in close preliminary votes. It is headed to another vote in the House as early as Thursday, the Legislature is next in session. If passed, it would echo a law that took effect in Maryland last year.
The bill's supporters include the ACLU of Maine, which says the measure offers “meaningful protections” against surveillance threats to democracy and personal autonomy. GLAD Law, a Boston-based advocacy group, has touted the proposal as a “major step forward” for digital privacy.